![]() 07/05/2016 at 19:51 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Welp, this won’t help her win over any enemies
![]() 07/05/2016 at 20:02 |
|
Normally it would be a hit on her campaign but she’s running against a Cheeto dust covered Chia Pet so I’m not sure it does much damage. Besides, who didn’t know that Hillary was an elitist, string-pulling politician? That was pretty much her ID from day one.
![]() 07/05/2016 at 20:07 |
|
Anyone ever think that maybe after countless Republican and Democratic hearings and now the FBI ruling, she might actually be innocent?
I know its crazy but maybe...just maybe.... what she did was blown out of proportion by her enemies and rivals and wasnt a big deal at all since it wasn’t illegal at the time.
![]() 07/05/2016 at 20:09 |
|
Uh n..... Ah never mind.
![]() 07/05/2016 at 20:11 |
|
Except that she isnt. DoD manual 5200 pursuant to EO 13526 pretty clearly states the guide lines for protecting classified information.
![]() 07/05/2016 at 20:31 |
|
![]() 07/05/2016 at 20:37 |
|
“Silly Americans, Laws are for poor people.”
I want that on a T-Shirt.
![]() 07/05/2016 at 20:45 |
|
Oh please the big shots at Davos already gave her their blessing. Unless she eats a live baby during one of her speeches she will be the next POTUS. Start thinking of Secret Service codenames - I call “Pantsuit”.
![]() 07/05/2016 at 20:57 |
|
yeah but no..... IF you listened to the FBI director today he said everything she did was illegal, but since he claims she was too stupid to know better, their recommending she doesn’t get in any trouble. Hence the 2nd meme....
![]() 07/05/2016 at 21:00 |
|
Don’t worry, I agree....but her enemies won’t be convinced by any sort of legitimate proceedings that have exonarated her... It just doesn’t fit the reasoning they can cling onto for not liking her
![]() 07/05/2016 at 21:25 |
|
It's ok, there's plenty more to work with even if she actually *was* not guilty of this
![]() 07/05/2016 at 21:28 |
|
Just like with Bill, at least you know what you are getting into with her. For the opponent, not so much,
![]() 07/05/2016 at 21:33 |
|
There was no coming out of this good for her. If she was indicted, it would finally vindicate 25 years of the GOP flinging bullshit to a wall trying to make it stick (and having no problems with the Bush administration running their entire office off of GOP e-mail server - because hypocrisy is for everyone!) and if she wasn’t indicted - as what happened here - then it clearly would mean there was a cover up and she bribed her way out of the indictment.
Even when she herself is vindicated she still loses to the crazy right-wing media like Breitbart, Fox News, Drudge report, etc. There’s literally no winning for this woman. Even the lack of evidence becomes evidence in and of itself against her.
![]() 07/05/2016 at 21:39 |
|
Not anyone that has ever been tasked with protecting classified information.
![]() 07/05/2016 at 21:39 |
|
I’m not even a Clinton supporter. But if multiple hearings and FBI that all agree with each other, maybe there’s something else to it
![]() 07/05/2016 at 21:40 |
|
![]() 07/05/2016 at 21:41 |
|
I can’t wait for her to win. Because I’m honestly curious how all these haters and people sending prison and death threats will go on with their lives.
I’m not a huge Clinton fan myself , but I would be flabbergasted if she lost
![]() 07/05/2016 at 21:46 |
|
I just don’t get folks being so viscerally against her when so many other folks, (including basically all Republican presidential staff,) handled it the same way. I know folks feel a bit uncomfortable with her fundraising - but honestly, it comes across as just sour grapes that she has been better at it using the same methods than the ‘Pubs in the last few election cycles. I know there are a few folks that should factually vote against her, (super high income folks, oil/coal industry folks, people that just personally dislike her and need to vote that way perhaps against their own self interest, single issue folks but her actions have historically pretty darn middle of the road. I mean if you are just emotionally angry with her, sure, I understand, but otherwise I don’t get it.
![]() 07/05/2016 at 21:59 |
|
They’ll be sending us to the glue factory in no time.
![]() 07/05/2016 at 22:09 |
|
That and, “It’s my fault, but it’s not my problem.”
![]() 07/05/2016 at 22:40 |
|
The way I see it, if it was really that big of a deal, they would have brought it to attention immediately instead of waiting 4 years until they realized she had a shot at the presidency. And this is coming from someone raised in a Hillary-hating household.
I ALWAYS recognize if someone emails me from their work or personal account, so there’s no way she went 4 years before someone noticed the @clintonemail signature.
![]() 07/05/2016 at 23:22 |
|
I want that for a bumper sticker on an S-Class.
![]() 07/06/2016 at 06:34 |
|
They’ll probably do the same thing they’ve done to Obama for the last 8 years - make up lies and/or exaggerate about every little thing she does.
Remember the whole “terrorist fist-bump (among dozens of others)?” The amount of manufactured outrage and contempt would have been hilarious were it not so detrimental to the actual governing of this country. We’ll just have 4-8 more years of the same.